When reflecting on this geographically, I imagine that one researching this would typically find the disease alleles to be common in locations where those who have been more affected by systemic lupus and those who are immuno compromised individuals (in which the disease systemic lupus effects the immune system) in locations such as Africa where there is also high statistics of the threat of malaria. These disease alleles would statistically reduce the cases of malaria. Regarding sickle cell anemia and whom it primarily affects those of African descent, the immunity is conferred hypothetically because the paper discusses how the virus is evolving and is correlated to other diseases that are in the geographic location.
2. In an evolutionary sense, why is it informative to study malaria and its implications in mice?
It’s important to study malaria because in this specific study, we are shown how the virulent strains that do not kill their intermediate host have a greater chance at increasing its genetic variation and thus cause change in an evolutionary sense. We can study its implications on mice because we can use things such as PCR and other advanced biotechnology techniques in order to discover new things about the virus in a controlled environment.
3. Apply Darwin’s four postulates to within-host Plasmodium virulence and transmission success.
4. On page 7624, the authors assert that “virulence is a consequence of a parasite’s efforts to maximize its fitness.” What is misleading about this sentence, and how could it be re-worded to accurately address how selection works?
5. If, as the authors suggest, more virulent strains have a competitive advantage within their mouse host, why do they conclude (page 7628) that “parasites evolve some intermediate level of virulence”?
6. Why is it important to study protein folding/misfolding in malaria, even though we know its cause?
Darwin's postulates:
- Variation exists among individuals of the same species - Plasmodium reproduces mitotically within hosts; variation is minimal. On a large scale, however, much variation exists between strains of Plasmodium.
- At least some variations are hereditary - In order to outlive hosts, Plasmodium must infiltrate the bloodstream adequatley for mosquitoes to ingest gametocytes.
- In every generation, more offspring are produced than can survive - Only gametocytes that are ingested by mosquitoes survive.
- Natural selection operates on populations - Plasmodium strains that are the most virulent without killing their respective hosts are the most likely to pass on their genes. The longer that the host remains alive, the more opportunities there will be for mosquitoes to ingest and inject into future hosts.
4. On page 7624, the authors assert that “virulence is a consequence of a parasite’s efforts to maximize its fitness.” What is misleading about this sentence, and how could it be re-worded to accurately address how selection works?
The sentence is misleading because a parasite's fitness depends largely upon the host's ability to survive. An alternative sentence: "In order to maximize fitness, parasites must effectively balance virulence with their respective host's ability to survive."
5. If, as the authors suggest, more virulent strains have a competitive advantage within their mouse host, why do they conclude (page 7628) that “parasites evolve some intermediate level of virulence”?
It is said, “parasites evolve some intermediate level of virulence,” because virulence is a by-product of with-in host competition, but extreme virulence will kill the host to quickly and prevent transmission. Parasites evolve virulence at an intermediate level in order to beat out other parasites and become transmitted while not killing their host too promptly.
6. Why is it important to study protein folding/misfolding in malaria, even though we know its cause?
It is important to study protein folding/misfolfing in malaria even though we know its cause, because if we under stand how the protein interacts we can then formulate more potent vaccines/immunizations.